 who were mentioned 537 times. For clarity, the ecomap visualisation does not list 537 entities, where there are duplicates the node visualisation is larger. A large node therefore means this entity has been mentioned many times. It is important to note that no data-matching or cleansing has been conducted, some of the entries are likely to represent duplicates of the same individual, where they have been spelt differently or abbreviations have been used. For example, names such as John Smith, JS, John, Jonny may all refer to the same person. The feedback from users about this was that this was acceptable, and expected due to the complexity of the data being represented and was not a barrier to the tool being seen as useful. A statement from a practitioner at the pilot workshops refers to this: “Even though the eco map may seem complicated at first glance, having access to more information is always advantageous, having the filters to redefine what is being searched is a great function. It enables us to make better-informed decisions and a more comprehensive understanding of the individual's network.” To validate the accuracy of the ecomaps analysis was undertaken cross-referencing the names provided by the attendees in their manual ecomap with the information available in the tool. An example of the manual cross-checking is available at Appendix 7. Number of Relationships in Source System The following is from data collected to understand average number of relationships as recorded in LiquidLogic in April 2023. Average immediate relationships Average other relationships Child in Need 5.2 1.4 Child Protection 6.2 2 Looked After Child 8.7 3.8 LAC/CP 7.1 2.2 Leaving Care 6.9 2.4 Average all Children Immediate Relationships: 7 Other Relationships: 2 Table 10: Average numbe