hroughout  Commitment and support from senior stakeholders facilitated progress Has the intervention resulted in any unintended outcomes?  The wider Public Sector, Local Authority and Social Care sectors are currently developing their approach to use of AI in practice. This is both in real terms and to inform the strategic direction of innovation and ideation of what services in the future look like. This Intervention has contributed to this debate and emerging approach and will continue to do so. The intervention gives confidence about AI in practice and informs the ethical and practical guardrails required to ensure practice remains safe and person centred Have the outcomes been influenced by any other external factors?  Delays due to challenges accessing AI services in a private environment To what extent have different groups been impacted in different ways, how and why?  Children’s Social Care Service has been impacted in a positive way, through demonstrating the capabilities of the prototype there were comments that displayed enthusiasm and anticipation of positive changes to processes forthcoming  The Council has been impacted as this work has helped in developing the corporate approach to ethical AI innovation Can the intervention be reproduced?  The intervention could be reproduced. This would be aided by some of the outputs of the project including technical guidance and “packaged” elements which would make reproducing the intervention significantly less complex than developing it What generalisable lessons have we learned about impact?  A longer term, independent evaluation is recommended to understand impact Summary of Impact Evaluation The intervention achieved the expected outcomes related to core functionalities of search and ecomaps. Detailed base