t time taken to perform the same task was 20 seconds. Comparing 20 seconds against either the 200 or 180 second values represent a reduction of over 94% in both cases for this one sample studied. Recommendations Further Development: - Work to implement the next steps from requirements analysis at Section 4.1.4 (E.g., enhance audit trail, finalise data refresh, LiquidLogic forms, expansion to other datasets including through work to define data standards) - Work to implement recommendations from User Experience - Test implementation based on documentation produced for other appropriate use cases Independent Evaluation: - Validate and assess the key hypotheses at Section 2.1.3 - Track the tool over one year (understand what improvements are required first and implement them, as per recommendation above). In this time look to particularly understand: o If there is a requirement for data matching – this means comparing two or more names/records and computing the possibility of them belonging to the same entity. o Costs – costs to run when new data is being added and support costs o How it is used by users Data Entry/Data Quality E.g., work towards defining the data standards which would be helpful to embed: - Update the filetypes being added to LiquidLogic (do not allow .doc files, these should all be .docx) because some Azure services are unable to process .doc files (old versions of Word documents for example) - Explore input methods (audio/transcriptions, photo, video) Information Security: The pilot included consultation and implementation of best practice technical infrastructure to ensure information security, there could be further work to validate the information security approach Data Governance: - An Information Asset Owner is defined and the Information Asset Reg