idence about children’s networks linked to ecomaps as well as valuable insight for further refining and optimising the tool. For more information see Section 4.3 (Evaluation of Expected Benefits), Section 4.4.2 (Evidence – Time Spent on Data Retrieval Tasks) and Section 4.4.3 (Evidence – Children’s Networks). 3.5 User Experience Testing Sessions Pilot workshops were developed in collaboration with the User Experience (UX) team. During the pilot workshop sessions moderated user testing was conducted and suggestions were made from the User Experience (UX) team to enhance the look and feel of the tool, including for accessibility. The UX team also conducted independent expert review and provided feedback. A summary of the feedback and recommendations from UX is included at Section 4.5.2 (User Experience Assessment). 3.6 Process Evaluation Questions: What can be learned from how the intervention was delivered? Was the intervention delivered as intended?  Key deliverables were delivered as intended and there was some opportunity to explore stretch goals and future opportunities  An Agile approach was taken, this allowed the project team to pivot and respond appropriately to changes  There were delays in respect of the start of the project and also during the project, time taken exploring options and changes in direction. The latter was expected in the context of an innovation pilot: o Delays relating to public/private endpoints and setting up secure infrastructure impacted the timeline on two occasions. In June/July 2023 to secure the Azure environment. Then later from Aug-Nov 2023 there was a requirement to do additional, unplanned work in order to access AI services in the secure environment. The work required was the creation of custom skills/functions and was relative