nical feasibility is related directly to the particular organisation or individual wishing to implement and will depend on various factors, including, capacity, skills, budget and digital/data maturity. Certain elements have not yet been finalised, this includes adding LiquidLogic forms and data refresh. These are referenced in the ‘must-have’ requirements (Table 6: ‘Must-have’ Requirements). 4.4.2 Evidence - Time Spent on Data Retrieval Tasks Time spent on data retrieval tasks was measured at initial case study workshops and staff were surveyed to understand baseline activities (activity types, how long activities take and how often activities are carried out). Then particular scenarios were tested at pilot workshops, where the same task was carried out using the tool. After summarising the data, the reduction in time and number of clicks is very significant. During the tests, it was noted that there could be significant variation for baseline measures, this was due to the location of the safety plan records and where the safety plan would be in the system (the standard deviation was 102 seconds). Time to find safety plan (seconds) Clicks Manual use of Source system 180 14 Using the Tool 17 5 Reduction 91% 64% 32 OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE Table 7: Table to compare time and clicks in retrieval of safety plan. The safety plan example was re-run serval times and the process and reporting was quality assured by the Business Analysis team. The time in seconds reduced from 180 to 17 and the number of clicks reduced from 14 to 5. Manual use of Source system (from Initial Workshops) Using the Tool (from Pilot Workshops) Team Task Time (seconds) Clicks Time (seconds) Clicks % time saved seconds Front door Finding a Safety Plan 180 14 17 5 91% Early Help Finding a Safety Plan 180 14 