articipation in the research. There were no incentives offered for participation or upon completion of the survey. The data is not weighted to any framework and represent a natural fall out of local area staff. The participating authorities in each phase of the survey followed the qualitative approach. In Phase 1, the survey was conducted among Wave 1 local areas (Dorset, Wolverhampton, Lincolnshire), while Wave 2 areas (Wirral, Warwickshire, Lewisham) were invited to participate alongside them in Phase 2 of fieldwork. This survey-based research approach was designed to provide quantitative measure to the perceptions of the FFCP model implementation among frontline staff. It also aided the understanding of the possible barriers faced by frontline staff as well as their short-term expectations of the model. Due to its two-phased approach, the survey also offers a comparison between local areas and comparisons across phases of the model implementation. Limitations/Context of the evaluation • The survey uses non-probability sampling method of self-completion, which makes participation voluntary. This could lead to higher engagement among respondents from staff with more positive or more negative views on the model • Low engagement rate among some local areas or types of staff roles, limiting the analysis due to low final sample size. We suppress data on sample of 30 or lower and flag as indicative only findings based on sample of 50 or lower. 61 Appendix 2 – Proforma for local areas Pillar: Overarching system level reform System reform Yes - in place/ delivered Yes - in design/plan ning phase No - not being implemente d Further comments (e.g. reasons for not implementing, factors driving delays in delivery, etc) Processes in place for ongoing consultation with families and