nalysis of what we did exactly because that’s why some workers put a lot of details, get it right. Some workers are now putting just one line [of] data because you get confused what is asked of you. Is it the young person’s view? You’ll see variations.” (Practitioner) A review of the wording and guidance on forms was recognised as being helpful to develop consistency among different individuals in the detail and volume of responses. This is something that the data consumers expressed a need for. Some wording was referred to as vague and unrealistic and, therefore, not user friendly. An example of this is a question on a form regarding expectations and identified tasks which has suggestions for the child/young person to choose. For these particular questions, data consumers suggested that a free text box could be used in its place rather than having the specific options which removes the corporate non-personalised suggestions the form presents. Practitioners and data consumers acknowledged that language is difficult to get right. Forms and questions are developed with the aim of them being used with all children and young people, however, individuals have different levels of understanding, different needs and therefore will understand and interact with the questions in different ways. Steps can be taken to support them to understand certain terminology which practitioners anticipate they will find difficult to understand. For example, one LA have specific staff members who will work with children and young people to explain language and the sentiment behind the questions. Missing Chapters Findings Children and young people voted clearly to understand the narrative of why they came into care and the reasons for social care involvement within their records. This was also v