es at the workshops. Attendees had the opportunity to go through it in the workshop and provide feedback. Front door team: “This user-friendly format will serve as a timesaving and valuable reference, particularly for those less familiar with technology. It’s a resource we can confidently revisit in the future”. Early Help: “The use of colour is helpful, and the inclusion of numerous images enhanced our understanding”. Adoption: “Using this document alongside the tool will be very helpful.” Leaving Care: “This document is easy to understand and follow, will be good to revisit if needed in the future.” Whilst the practice guidance developed for this project has been made consistent with other practice guidance available to CSC practitioners at NYC in terms of format and presentation, the contents would be transferable to another local authority. A copy of the practice guidance is available at Appendix 16 (Practice Guidance AI Tool). 50 OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE 4.5.7 User Confidence During the pilot workshops attendees were asked the question “Overall do you agree with this statement ‘I am confident that the information presented by the tool is accurate’”. The responses to this question were positive. Attendees had high levels of confidence that the information was accurate, noting that it was the same information that was in the source system. 4.5.8 Acceptability summary The following comments can be made related to acceptability. It should be noted however, that there is still significant development work to do to refine and iterate the products. When this has been achieved a larger scale pilot could be undertaken to better understand levels of acceptance and user satisfaction. This could also be expanded to take place with other datasets and in other areas of the Local Aut