 the tool’s use cannot be measured across the workforce yet. Records reflect the work that is done: Increased variety of different recording mediums (e.g., audio transcription, video) could enable more holistic records. The project and development did not include any changes to data input mechanisms, however the infrastructure developed allows for more exploratory work in this area. Able to protect children better proactively before they come to harm: With a re-referral rate of 14.8% a longer pilot would gain a better understanding about whether utilising ecomaps provides a deeper understanding of the networks and relationships within a community. Utilising ecomaps could potentially identify and address issues before they escalate. A reduction in the number of children entering care: This benefit could be realised as more information would be available resulting in better decision-making and less progression through services. Additionally, a longer pilot could potentially decrease the percentage of cases converted from a Child Protection Plan to Child in Care. Auto-redaction: The capability of the tool to auto-redact was proven technically, however was not a function required by users in this particular use case. Reduction in data breaches: This benefit could be realised as the tool reduces the need for users to download documents. Data breaches are recorded and monitored corporately and this measure could be revisited in a longer term pilot. National usability and scalability: This would be measured by other Local Authorities adopting the tool. There is a high-level of interest in the project, see comments in Section 4.5.4 (Project Engagement). This, alongside the results and recommendations included in this report, indicate there are opportunities to build on existing