 with DfE and colleagues in LAs to design the next stage of work which should answer these questions. In the meantime, we’ll measure success of the current project in terms of the original project brief. 8.1. Satisfaction of the project brief The brief called for two key deliverables, preceded by a first phase of research, as detailed in section 4 above. 19 Stage 1: Data mapping Data mapping completed including consultation User research Two phases of research completed successfully Research report Two reports provided to DfE Dataset specification Live online specification available to all stakeholders Comparison to existing returns Detailed in live online specification Stage 2: Production methods Production methods for 2 market-leading CMSs Maintenance framework Framework live and documented via GitHub We’ve detailed our approaches to each of these deliverables in earlier report sections. The final two are those requiring immediate further work: most pressingly, there are three CMS products in use across around 20 LAs for which we do not yet have production methods for the SSD. This represents less than 15% of LAs, but any standard is only as strong as its market share, and we believe that it’s crucial to produce shareable code for these remaining LAs even though the per-LA cost is necessarily higher. Our project was unable to complete this work according to the original schedule, in large part because, with a smaller user base, we were unable to find partner LAs for these systems with suitable technical resource available at short notice. In each case we have identified a partner LA and begun working with them on a delivery plan, but these plans will extend beyond the current financial year and are therefore currently unfunded. We are working with DfE to ensure this w