y of reviews 5.34. Where the child has not yet been placed for adoption, the first review under the AAR must take place no more than three months after the agency obtained authorisation to place, and thereafter not more than six months after the previous review. This is the ‘six month review’ referred to in AAR 36.7, where particular consideration must be given to establishing why the child has not yet been placed and whether the adoption plan is still appropriate. If a review is needed sooner than three months after authorisation to place in order to comply with the 2010 regulations, this will also be the first review under the AAR. The child’s details must be placed on the Adoption Register no later than three months after the agency’s decision-maker has decided (after considering the adoption panel’s recommendation) that the child should be placed for adoption, see chapter 2. 5.35. When the child has been placed for adoption, the first review must be held no more than four weeks after placement, the second no more than three months after this, and subsequent reviews held at six-monthly intervals until an adoption order is made, or the child is no longer placed with the prospective adopter. These provisions set out the maximum intervals between reviews. The agency may conduct additional reviews where it considers it appropriate, and should always be prepared to do so at the request of the prospective adopter or the child. In addition, if the placement disrupts and the child is returned to the agency or removed from the placement by the agency, a review under AAR 36.10 must be held between 28 days and 42 days after the disruption. Conduct of reviews 5.36. The agency should provide written information about how it intends to review a child’s case to the prospective adop