 opportunity to bring all agencies together to scrutinise the options for bringing stability back into a young person’s life. 4.16. The above requirements for review describe the maximum permitted intervals between reviews. Reviews should always be brought forward where there is an assessed risk that a crisis may develop in a young person’s life. The purpose of these meetings will be to allow all the agencies supporting the young person to meet with them and to agree strategies so that any potential crises can be averted. 10 Statutory guidance on promoting the health and wellbeing of looked after children (2009) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/promoting-the-health-and-wellbeing-of-looked-after-children 36 4.17. For example, given the serious implications for a young person’s future, the responsible authority, or a relevant or former relevant young person’s PA, might usually make sure that a review should take place: • Where a young person has been charged with an offence and there is a possibility of their being sentenced to custody, which will risk losing their (suitable) accommodation. • Where a young person is at risk of being evicted from their accommodation or otherwise threatened with homelessness. • Where professionals are concerned about the parenting capacity of a relevant or former relevant young person, with there being a possibility that their own child may need to become the subject of a multi-agency safeguarding plan. • Where a young person asks for a review of their plan. 4.18. Each local authority will need to have a policy about how reviews for relevant and former relevant young people will be chaired. 4.19. The young person must be engaged in making the arrangements about how their pathway plan is to be reviewed. Young people may suggest tha