ected and how that might fit with current practice models like Sign of Safety. • Suppliers need to issue a best practice model with their product design that should work ‘out of the box’ and comply with reporting requirements (not yet known). • How to redesign now not knowing what the interim or future reporting requirements will be and what is voluntary/mandatory. • The DfE want LAs to count everything the same as now, but want us to do it differently at the same time, can we not stop reporting on the distinction between EH and CIN? We are just adding more data into a return that is already overly complicated, and we know yet more is to follow. • Where is Ofsted in terms of the Annex A and how they will inspect authorities that are in transition from one model to another especially when the CMS solution is not yet available to fully support it. • How to separate the Targeted Early Help cohort from the CIN cohort and if this is about merging threshold why will this still be needed as it will complicate the supplier design as well? • Every LA does Early Help differently how do we get some consistency going forward, including shared definitions. • Account needs to be taken of those LAs who are going to commission out some of their Family Help service delivery and how they use the CMS. • Concerns about potential data migration costs moving clients from one workflow across to another if 2 tiers are being maintained in a single workflow that will add even more complexity/cost. • What is happening to the Supporting Families framework? Some LAs have spent a lot of money having this functionality embedded in their CMS to help identify families and monitor progress against outcomes and don’t necessarily want to lose this but they also don’t want to duplicate or overlap what the 