referred means of communication, they could be assisted to express their wishes by other means such as an audio-recording. Where the child is old enough, they should also be encouraged to confirm that their views have been accurately stated. The CPR should make it clear whether the parents have seen the CPR, or parts of it, and include any comments they have expressed on it. 2.66. The CPR must contain an analysis of the options that have been considered by the agency for the future care of the child, and explain why adoption is considered the preferred option. In some cases, particularly those involving older children who may have experienced many problems, it may be that the best chance of finding a satisfactory long- term placement for a child is to keep open the options of placement with either adoptive parents or with long-term foster carers, so that the net may be cast as wide as possible. In the case of SB v a County Council, Re P [2008] EWCA Civ 535, the court confirmed that it is permissible for the agency to pursue a dual or parallel plan. This is to be distinguished from concurrent planning. This enables the agency, where it considers the child should be placed for adoption, to start seeking adoptive and foster parents at the same time. In this case the adoption panel will recommend that the child should be placed for adoption while, at the same time, acknowledging that the fostering plan may be pursued. 2.67. AAR 16, as well as listing the items of information to be included in the CPR, requires that it contain any other information which the agency considers relevant and helpful. The social worker will need to think carefully about which documents should be sent to the adoption panel or decision-maker. It is unhelpful to them to receive hundreds of pages thr