e the decision is not to approve the prospective adopter, the agency must provide the reasons for the decision. If the adoption panel’s or review panel’s recommendation was different, a copy of that recommendation must also be provided to the prospective adopter. In respect of a case referred to the independent review panel, the Secretary of State must also be given written notification of the decision. Review of approval: AAR 30D 3.85. In most cases, the approved prospective adopter should be quickly matched with a child and, where possible, the adoption agency should begin looking for a match alongside the approvals process. While the matching process is ongoing (or there is a break in the [family finding] because the prospective adopter needs more time) the adoption social worker should maintain contact with the prospective adopter and keep them informed of progress, and encourage them to keep the agency informed of any changes in their lives. This will also be a time of reflection and the prospective adopter may reconsider the characteristics of the children they feel able to parent. The agency should be responsive to changes of view, allowing the opportunity to discuss these and consider their possible implications. 3.86. AAR 30D(2) requires the agency to review the prospective adopter’s approval periodically until a child is placed for adoption with them or a match is under active consideration. Such a review must be held a year after approval and, subsequently, at yearly intervals or earlier if the agency considers it necessary. 3.87. The need for an earlier review could arise, for instance, where a child was placed with the prospective adopter and the placement disrupts, a couple separates, there are substantive changes in their health or their economic circumst