nance and ethical use of data for the benefit of children, families and organisations. The wider Public Sector, Local Authority and Social Care sectors are currently developing their approach to use of AI in practice. This is both in real terms and to inform the strategic direction of innovation and ideation of what services in the future look like. This project should contribute to this debate and emerging approach. The project gives confidence about AI in practice and informs the ethical and practical guardrails required to ensure practice remains safe and person centred. Further work could be done to engage with children and families to understand their views about using data in this way. The technical guidance including packaged elements would help to ease the deployment effort for another organisation and could improve acceptability amongst other Local Authorities, especially where significant capacity and budget pressures exist. Users had a high level of confidence that the information was accurate, noting that it was the same information that was in the source system. User feedback was collected at an early stage and throughout the development. Comments from practitioners and subject matter experts, including considerations from impact assessments, have helped in developing the practice guidance. Feedback on the guidance that has been developed from practitioners was 51 OFFICIAL - SENSITIVE positive. The contents of the practice guidance would be relevant to other Local Authorities and is transferable. 4.6 Next steps/recommendations Further Development: - Work to implement the next steps from requirements analysis at Section 4.1.4 (E.g., enhance audit trail, finalise data refresh, LiquidLogic forms, expansion to other datasets including through work to define dat