 accurately in their record  The design of some forms in the CMS does not always flow or link appropriate information together  Information relating to missing episodes is not routinely shared with IROs. This information is not pulled through the CMS for any forms used by IROs  Practitioners record information in different ways, and some include more details than others. Therefore, consistency of what is recorded and examples of what ‘good’ looks like in terms of capturing data is missing 46 DfE Project 2A: User research into social worker inputted data to CMS  The Missing Chapters research found that children and young people consider photographs, films, and audio as important for adults to keep for them At the outset of the research, it was thought that a secondary list of data items could be collated which includes information not recorded but practitioners feel should be. The research found that one or two practitioners suggested information which may be helpful, but there was not a unanimous feeling among those interviewed that valuable data was missing from forms or not being recorded. The only information mentioned was with regard to immigration status, missing episodes, and parental personal details. Although no data item was considered unhelpful, practitioners often felt overwhelmed at the volume of information they are expected to collect. This meant they found it challenging to identify information and data which is not captured but should be. The majority of data items included in the data matrix were identified as ‘local’ data collected for:  practitioners and/or the child/young person  management oversight of case decisions and accountability purposes  LA reporting purposes and generating performance indicators  statutory data requirements outside 